Descriptive and Inferential Statistics are the two major branches of statistical analysis. Both help you give meaning to numbers, but a good number of people often get confused between the two. This is because they involve more or less the same types of quantities. However, they greatly differ in terms of the data used and the way in which the data is used.
Picture this. You own a restaurant and want to know how your business is being perceived by people. So, you give one of your staff, Amy, the responsibility of carrying out a small survey of your customers to see how they feel. Amy is really excited about the prospect of earning some extra cash and goes head on to collect information from every client who visits your restaurant. At the end of the week, Amy comes to you with a giant grin on her face and hands to you a long list of numbers that contain how many points each client has given your business. You stare down at this soup of numbers and scratch your head as you have no idea what to make of it! You’re probably considering firing Amy at the moment, right?
Well, Amy’s efforts weren’t exactly in vain, but what she should have done instead of just handing you a bunch of numbers was to represent these numbers in a more meaningful way so that you could make a proper inference from them. This is where statistical analysis comes into play.
The textbook difference of descriptive vs inferential statistics is as follow: Descriptive statistics are used to summarize a sample or information about the sample. Inferential statistics, on the other hand, are used to make inferences or generalizations about the broader population.
Let’s try to understand this in terms of our example. Amy got hold of about 100 customer feedbacks. Say your customers filled out a survey form where they scored your restaurant on a scale of 1 to 10. She could have organized these scores into a chart or graph to let you pictorially deduce how many of your customers think your food rocks. Assuming 75 of them gave you more than 5 points, while 25 of them gave you less than 5 points. It would serve you better if Amy had created a Pie chart that clearly indicated what percentage of your clients/customers love you. In this case, you could easily see that 75% percent of your customers like you, so you’re right on track!
She could also have calculated an average of all the scores to give you an idea of the general client sentiment. So, if most of the clients scored you between 6 and 7, your average would come to around 6.5, showing that it’s not all the bad, but you could do better. There are many other ways to visualize data or draw an inference from a limited set of data. These include other measures of central tendency like median and mode as well as measures of dispersion, like variance and standard deviation. These values can give you an idea of how varied the opinions of your customers are. Altogether all these measures and visualizations could give you a pretty good idea about how your business is doing.
Now, what if your company is really big and you have branches or franchises all over the world? In that case, you would be dealing with the sentiments of millions of people here. Would it be possible to get the opinions of every client who visits every branch/ franchise of yours in every country? Well, I wouldn’t say it’s impossible, but it will surely cost you an arm and a leg. The wise thing to do in such a situation is to pick a representative sample from the entire population of clients/customers, derive an inference from the set and then extrapolate your results to the entire population. While this process isn’t completely error-free, it can give you a reasonably accurate idea about your entire client base. So, if you take a sample of, say 1000 randomly selected customer opinions and find that 80% of them like your services, you can be fairly confident that a good portion of your entire population of clients also feel the same way.
The challenge, however, lies in finding a sample that best represents the entire population. You don’t just want to pick a sample that only has clients from a particular country or from a particular social status. The best sample is one where every person in your customer base has an equal chance of being included in the sample, and there are many strategies available to help you do that. The main gist of the matter is that inferential statistics involves reaching conclusions about a large population, based on information obtained from a smaller sample of data in that population.
Descriptive vs Inferential Statistics:
In descriptive statistics, we work on a group of data that we want to describe and then measure every subject in that group. The statistical representative numbers or visual representations that we obtain usually describes the whole group with certainty.
In inferential statistics, we take a sample of the data from the entire population of data that we want to work on and then get some statistical representative numbers or visual representations for that sample. These results cannot speak of the whole population with complete certainty but can give us an understanding of the entire population.